ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Hemorrhage in acute promyelocytic leukemia-fibrinolysis in focus.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment and validation of a 28-day clinical outcome prediction model for acute promyelocytic leukemia based on an early platelet-coagulation factor combined transfusion strategy.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Clinical Management.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- Hemostatic abnormalities in acute promyelocytic leukemia: clinical implications and mechanisms.Current opinion in hematology · 2025Review
- Establishment and Application of Warning Scoring System for Bleeding Severity in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coagulopathy continues to be a major challenge in the management of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Novel differentiating agents have led to improved survival in these patients, but perturbations in coagulation continue to have an impact on their prognosis. The most worrisome of coagulation disturbances is bleeding, which is not an uncommon cause of early death in APL. Despite this, there are no consistent predictors of this high risk of fatal hemorrhage in APL. In this context, the fibrinolytic system has been identified as a crucial role player in APL coagulopathy. However, the current guidelines for the management of APL give little regard to tests that measure the fibrinolytic system while giving more importance to close monitoring of conventional coagulation tests and platelet counts to identify the coagulopathy. More recently, viscoelastic tests have come to usefulness in determining global hemostasis and have been widely used for "diagnosing" hyperfibrinolysis in selected clinical settings. In this review, we attempt to describe risk assessment models for diagnosing APL coagulopathy, describe the possible application of viscoelastic tests in this setting, and persuade clinicians to reconsider the use of antifibrinolytics to improve survival of APL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.