Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130779›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024

Hemorrhage in acute promyelocytic leukemia-fibrinolysis in focus.

Nikica Sabljic, Jecko Thachil, Nikola Pantic, Mirjana Mitrovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Establishment and Application of Warning Scoring System for Bleeding Severity in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikica SabljicClinic of Hematology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jecko ThachilDepartment of Hematology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Nikola PanticClinic of Hematology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Mirjana MitrovicClinic of Hematology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coagulopathy continues to be a major challenge in the management of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Novel differentiating agents have led to improved survival in these patients, but perturbations in coagulation continue to have an impact on their prognosis. The most worrisome of coagulation disturbances is bleeding, which is not an uncommon cause of early death in APL. Despite this, there are no consistent predictors of this high risk of fatal hemorrhage in APL. In this context, the fibrinolytic system has been identified as a crucial role player in APL coagulopathy. However, the current guidelines for the management of APL give little regard to tests that measure the fibrinolytic system while giving more importance to close monitoring of conventional coagulation tests and platelet counts to identify the coagulopathy. More recently, viscoelastic tests have come to usefulness in determining global hemostasis and have been widely used for "diagnosing" hyperfibrinolysis in selected clinical settings. In this review, we attempt to describe risk assessment models for diagnosing APL coagulopathy, describe the possible application of viscoelastic tests in this setting, and persuade clinicians to reconsider the use of antifibrinolytics to improve survival of APL patients.

Indexed as

acute promyelocytic leukemiableedingfibrinolysis

Identifiers

PMID39130779
PMCPMC11314889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.