Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130769›Full record

ReviewGastro hep advances2023

Clinical Consequences of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss in Chronic Hepatitis B Infection: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Eleonora Morais, Lauren Mason, John Dever, Pam Martin, Jing Voon Chen, Leigh Felton, Stuart Kendrick, Dickens Theodore, Iain A Gillespie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastro hep advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. [APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a 2026 update].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Controversy and consensus on antiviral treatment strategies for low-level hepatitis B surface antigens].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eleonora MoraisEpidemiology, Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, London, UK.
Lauren MasonPallas Health Research and Consultancy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John DeverBusiness Intelligence, Three Rivers Federal Credit Union, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Pam MartinModeling & Analytics, Medical Decision Modeling Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana.
Jing Voon ChenEvidence Strategy, Genesis Research, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Leigh FeltonDevelopment Clinical Sciences, Hepatology and GI, GSK, London, UK.
Stuart KendrickGlobal Medical Affairs - Speciality Care, GSK, London, UK.
Dickens TheodoreDevelopment Clinical Sciences, Hepatology and GI, GSK, London, UK.
Iain A GillespieEpidemiology, Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Functional cure, which requires sustained hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss after treatment cessation, is currently the optimal treatment endpoint for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analyses to assess the association between HBsAg loss and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed a SLR of scientific literature published in Medline and Embase reporting the incidence of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (HD), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver-related mortality (LRM), and all-cause mortality (ACM) in relation to HBsAg status. Bayesian hierarchical commensurate prior meta-analyses synthesized evidence on the association between HBsAg loss and each outcome. Results: Thirty-eight studies, comprising 50,354 patients with 350,734 patient-years of follow-up, were included in the meta-analyses, reporting on cirrhosis (n = 12), HD (n = 12), HCC (n = 36), LRM (n = 12), and ACM (n = 16). Pooled incidence rate ratios (IRRs; vs HBsAg persistence) and respective credible intervals (Crls) were 0.28 (0.060-1.070) for cirrhosis, 0.13 (0.013-0.38) for HD, 0.27 (0.11-0.53) for HCC, 0.17 (0.028-0.61) for LRM, and 0.64 (0.24-1.17) for ACM. Single-predictor-adjusted IRRs remained consistent with those from the primary analyses for all outcomes except cirrhosis and LRM. Outcome incidence rates were modified by selected study, patient and infection characteristics, but trended in the same direction of reduced risk after loss. Conclusion: Overall, HBsAg loss was associated with a reduced risk of most clinically relevant outcomes. While the magnitude of the effect differed across subgroups, the direction of the association remained similar. Our results validate the need to develop new strategies to achieve HBsAg loss.

Indexed as

BiomarkerChronic HBV InfectionClinical OutcomesHBsAg LossMeta-Analysis

Identifiers

PMID39130769
PMCPMC11307919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.