ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Managed With Endovascular Therapies Compared to Medical Therapy.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular Therapy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Ready for Prime Time?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Longer-Term Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Intermediate- and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: 6-Month FLASH Registry Results.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Guidelines on the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) recommend consideration of endovascular therapies (EVT) for patients at intermediate-high risk. However, long-term data on the outcomes of patients after EVT as compared to medical therapy is lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes of patients receiving EVT as compared to medical therapy alone at 3 to 6 months. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 190 patients with PE underwent evaluation for presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction by transthoracic echocardiogram, residual perfusion defects on ventilation-perfusion scanning, and functional capacity by 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) at 3 to 6 month follow-up. Results: Fifty-eight (31%) patients received EVT for the management of their acute PE. At follow-up (median 120 [97-170] days), 71% of patients who received EVT had normalization of RV function compared with only 34% of patients who received medical therapy alone ( Conclusions: Patients with acute PE who received EVT plus medical therapy were more likely to achieve normalization of RV dysfunction at 3 to 6 month follow-up compared to patients who received medical therapy alone. These data suggest that EVT is an effective therapy option for acute PE in intermediate-high and high risk patients with potential durable long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.