Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130704›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Jacqueline Saw, David R Holmes, João L Cavalcante, James V Freeman, Andrew M Goldsweig, Clifford J Kavinsky, Issam D Moussa, Thomas M Munger, Matthew J Price, Mark Reisman and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Past, Present, and Future.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pulmonary artery perforation after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: two case reports and review of literature.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Review
  12. 2025 SCAI/HRS Clinical Practice Guidelines on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  13. SCAI/HRS Technical Review on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Comprehensive Review of Percutaneous and Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jacqueline SawDivision of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Canada.
David R HolmesDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
João L CavalcanteDepartment of Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
James V FreemanSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Andrew M GoldsweigDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Clifford J KavinskyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
Issam D MoussaCarle Heart and Vascular Institute, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, Illinois.
Thomas M MungerDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
Matthew J PriceDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, California.
Mark ReismanDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Matthew William SherwoodDivision of Cardiology, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Fairfax, Virginia.
Zoltan G TuriCenter for Structural and Congenital Heart Disease, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey.
Dee Dee WangCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Brian K WhisenantDivision of Cardiology, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exclusion of the left atrial appendage to reduce thromboembolic risk related to atrial fibrillation was first performed surgically in 1949. Over the past 2 decades, the field of transcatheter endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded, with a myriad of devices approved or in clinical development. The number of LAAC procedures performed in the United States and worldwide has increased exponentially since the Food and Drug Administration approval of the WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific) device in 2015. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) has previously published statements in 2015 and 2016 providing societal overview of the technology and institutional and operator requirements for LAAC. Since then, results from several important clinical trials and registries have been published, technical expertise and clinical practice have matured over time, and the device and imaging technologies have evolved. Therefore, SCAI prioritized the development of an updated consensus statement to provide recommendations on contemporary, evidence-based best practices for transcatheter LAAC focusing on endovascular devices.

Indexed as

CHA2DS2-VAScdevice-related thrombusembolic stroke preventionleft atrial appendage closurenon-valvular atrial fibrillationperidevice leak

Identifiers

PMID39130704
PMCPMC11307869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.