Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130652›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2024

The role of

Seockmo Ku, Md Ariful Haque, Min Ji Jang, Jaehyun Ahn, Deokyeong Choe, Jong Ik Jeon, Myeong Soo Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A probioticGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Host-associatedCurrent research in food science · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Application and Challenges of Using ProbioticDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seockmo KuDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2661-5073
Md Ariful HaqueDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 USA.
Min Ji JangDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 USA.
Jaehyun AhnDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 USA.
Deokyeong ChoeSchool of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566 Korea.
Jong Ik JeonResearch Center, BIFIDO Co., Ltd, Hongcheon, 25117 South Korea.
Myeong Soo ParkResearch Center, BIFIDO Co., Ltd, Hongcheon, 25117 South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores the role and health impacts of probiotics, focusing specifically on

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumCentenariansLongevityMicrobiomeProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID39130652
PMCPMC11315853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.