ArticleACS omega2024
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Cyclic Voltammetry Behavior of Substitution of Zinc and Cobalt in BiFeO
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and machine learning have become indispensable tools across various disciplines in the present century. In that way, the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in energy storage devices was investigated. As a preliminary study, the data derived from electrochemical studies were used for the prediction. The prediction of current from cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies was undertaken for bismuth ferrite (BFO), substitution of zinc in BFO (BFZO), and substitution of cobalt in BFO composite (BFCO). CV is a vital electrochemical technique used for studying the electrochemical behavior of any material. The electrochemical study provides insights into the energy storage behavior of the material through the specific capacitance. The machine learning models, such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB), are trained and implemented to predict current at different scan rates. These models are trained and validated using the data collected from a CHI 600E electrochemical workstation. Multiple trials of experiments were performed to build the most optimum model for the material. The predicted values provide promising results and align well with the experimental data. The XGBoost, ANN and RF models perform well for the CV data set with an average testing accuracy >97%. Also, a meta-model was created using stacking of the above three machine learning models which further improved the predictive performance, achieving a slightly higher average testing accuracy of over 97.73%. The outcomes from the models can promote the development of machine learning applications in the field of electrochemistry and provide insights into optimizing supercapacitor performance and design through data-driven approaches.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.