Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130584›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Cyclic Voltammetry Behavior of Substitution of Zinc and Cobalt in BiFeO

Abhilash Ravichandran, Valliappan Raman, Yogapriya Selvaraj, Prabhavathy Mohanraj, Hemalatha Kuzhandaivel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhilash RavichandranDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Andhra Pradesh, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh 534101, India.
Valliappan RamanDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641014, India.
Yogapriya SelvarajMaterials Research and Product Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641014, India.
Prabhavathy MohanrajDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2575-9024
Hemalatha KuzhandaivelMaterials Research and Product Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4082-1156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning have become indispensable tools across various disciplines in the present century. In that way, the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in energy storage devices was investigated. As a preliminary study, the data derived from electrochemical studies were used for the prediction. The prediction of current from cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies was undertaken for bismuth ferrite (BFO), substitution of zinc in BFO (BFZO), and substitution of cobalt in BFO composite (BFCO). CV is a vital electrochemical technique used for studying the electrochemical behavior of any material. The electrochemical study provides insights into the energy storage behavior of the material through the specific capacitance. The machine learning models, such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB), are trained and implemented to predict current at different scan rates. These models are trained and validated using the data collected from a CHI 600E electrochemical workstation. Multiple trials of experiments were performed to build the most optimum model for the material. The predicted values provide promising results and align well with the experimental data. The XGBoost, ANN and RF models perform well for the CV data set with an average testing accuracy >97%. Also, a meta-model was created using stacking of the above three machine learning models which further improved the predictive performance, achieving a slightly higher average testing accuracy of over 97.73%. The outcomes from the models can promote the development of machine learning applications in the field of electrochemistry and provide insights into optimizing supercapacitor performance and design through data-driven approaches.

Identifiers

PMID39130584
PMCPMC11307299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.