Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130560›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Pore-Scale Numerical Simulation of Acid-Rock Reaction Processes in Carbonate Reservoirs.

Dongxu Zhang, Yaqi Li, Tongtong Luo, Haijie Zhang, Runhua Zhu, Chengyong Li, Chengxi Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dongxu ZhangCollege of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4911-9339
Yaqi LiCollege of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China.
Tongtong LuoCCDC Geological Exploration & Development Research Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan 610056, China.
Haijie ZhangCCDC Geological Exploration & Development Research Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan 610056, China.
Runhua ZhuCollege of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China.
Chengyong LiCollege of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China.
Chengxi WuCollege of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of acidizing carbonate reservoirs, dissolution is employed for reservoir modification to enhance recovery rates. This study establishes a numerical model at the pore scale for acid-rock reaction flow based on a microscopic continuum medium model, integrating phase-field theory and component transport models. Subsequently, the results of the Darcy-Brinkman-Stokes model are compared to those of the arbitrary Lagrange-Euler method to validate the accuracy of the model. Finally, the flow behavior of the acid solution at the pore scale and the complex dissolution mechanisms in carbonate reservoirs are analyzed. The research indicates that the microscopic pore-scale dissolution in carbonate reservoirs mainly manifests as five dissolution modes: uniform dissolution, compact dissolution, conical wormholes, dominant wormhole, and ramified wormholes. Different distributions of microfractures will alter the flow state of the acid solution and the rock-acid reaction process within the pores. Once the wormhole breakthrough occurs, there is an increased probability of acid flow through the wormhole to the outlet, leading to a decrease in the effectiveness of the acidizing carbonate reservoirs. A proper understanding of pore-scale acid-rock reaction laws is of great significance for the development of carbonate oil and gas reservoirs.

Identifiers

PMID39130560
PMCPMC11307295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.