Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130519›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Using inpatient telehealth for family engagement: A mixed methods study of perceptions from patients, families, and care team providers.

Jennifer L Rosenthal, Jacob Williams, Keegan F Bowers, Sarah C Haynes, Lori Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer L RosenthalDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5543-4709
Jacob WilliamsGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences & Professional Studies, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Keegan F BowersPediatric Residency Program, Kaiser Oakland, Oakland, CA, USA.
Sarah C HaynesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Lori KennedyCenter for Nursing Science, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9179-4202

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
Telemedicine Consultations to Improve Care Quality of Pediatric Hospital-to-Hospital TransfersK23HD101550 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ROSENTHAL, JENNIFER · 2020 to 2023
$803k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD101550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Inpatient Telehealth Program permits family to remotely communicate with the patient and care team through secure, live video. We aimed to assess the implementation of this program for family engagement from the perspectives of patients, families, and providers. Methods: We used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of surveys assessing patient, family, and provider experience. The qualitative component used thematic analysis of patient, family, and provider interviews plus survey free text responses. We performed memo-writing and coding. We developed hypotheses about relationships among categories and identified analytic themes. We used data transformation and narrative discussion to report the integrated findings. Results: Surveys from 214 individuals (33 patients, 145 family, 36 providers) were evaluated. Mean (standard deviation) experience ratings (1-poor, 5-best) were 4.0 (1.5) for patients, 4.6 (0.8) for family, and 4.0 (1.4) for providers. We received 134 free text responses and conducted 21 interviews. Three themes emerged: (1) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient and family experience through strengthened relationships and increased support; (2) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient care through improved information sharing and engagement; (3) low awareness of the program limited adoption. Quantitative and qualitative data aligned in that participants perceived inpatient telehealth to be valuable; however, surveys revealed that patients and providers have relatively lower satisfaction with the program. Conclusion: Inpatient telehealth for family engagement was perceived to improve family-centeredness of care. Future work is needed to overcome implementation challenges and to increase awareness of this resource among patients and families.

Indexed as

communicationhospitalizationimplementation sciencepatient-centered careTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39130519
PMCPMC11316967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.