ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2024
Tissue Adhesive versus Skin Suture plus Waterproof Wound Dressings for Carpal Tunnel Wound Closure: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Elective Hand Surgery: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Preheating 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Reduces Curing Time in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Randomized Study.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The popular wound closure methods for carpal tunnel decompression (CTD) include non-absorbable and absorbable sutures which have comparable results in clinical outcomes. However, these wound closure methods are recommended to keep a wound dry which may limit some ADLs. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial that compares clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in a skin closure following CTD between absorbable sutures plus a 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (2OCA) versus non-absorbable skin sutures plus a waterproof dressing (NSPWD). Materials and Methods: We enrolled 120 patients undergoing CTD into two groups: 2OCA and NSPWD, with 60 patients in each group. Number of dressing changes, Quick DASH, pain VAS, cosmetic VAS, patient satisfaction VAS, and Hollander wound evaluation score, cost-effectiveness, and post-operative complications were collected at pre-operative period and two and six weeks post-operatively. Results: Slightly better patient satisfaction VAS (7.9 vs 7.2, p=0.018) and cosmetic VAS (8.0 vs 7.2, p=0.025) were observed in 2OCA at 2 weeks. Meanwhile, NSPWD revealed lesser times of dressing change (Median, mode, IQR: 0/0/0 vs 2/3/2, p<0.001). The total wound-related costs include dressing change and suture removal cost ($15.9 for 2OCA vs $19.2 for NSPWD, p=0.002) although an initial wound-related cost in 2OCA was higher ($15.7/case vs $7.9/case, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study revealed that the supplementary tissue adhesive to absorbable sutures following CTD could reduce total wound-related costs while clinical outcomes might not be considered clinically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.