ArticleHeliyon2024
MedCapsNet: A modified Densenet201 model integrated with capsule network for heel disease detection and classification.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Assisted Classification of Pathogenic Yeasts Using Laser Light Scattering and Conventional Microscopy.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conditions affecting the heel bone, such as heel spurs and sever's disease, pose significant challenges to patients' daily activities. While orthopedic and traumatology doctors rely on foot X-rays for diagnosis, there is a need for more AI-based detection and classification of these conditions. Therefore, this study addresses this need by proposing MedcapsNet, a novel hybrid capsule model combining modified DenseNet201 with a capsule network, designed to accurately detect and classify heel bone diseases utilizing lateral heel x-ray foot images. We conducted a comprehensive series of experiments on the proposed hybrid architecture with several datasets, including the Heel dataset, Breast BreaKHis v1, HAM10000 skin cancer dataset, and Jun Cheng Brain MRI dataset. The first experiment evaluates the proposed model for heel diseases, while the other experiments evaluate the model on a range of medical datasets to demonstrate its performance over existing studies. On the heel dataset, MedCapsNet achieves an accuracy of 96.38%, AUC of 98.35% without data augmentation, cross-validation accuracy of 95.69%, and AUC of 98.87%. The proposed model, despite employing a fixed architecture and hyperparameters, outperformed other models across four distinct datasets, including MRI, X-ray, and microscopic images with various diseases. This is notable because different types of medical image datasets typically require different architectures and hyperparameters to achieve optimal performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.