ArticleHeliyon2024
Integrative analyses of genes associated with oxidative stress and cellular senescence in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autophagy-Apoptosis Crosstalk in Cancer: Mechanisms, Signaling Pathways, and Therapeutic Targeting.Cancers · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a highly accurate multigene gene expression biomarker to predict chemotherapy response in primary triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Exploring Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Related Genes in Cartilage Defects: Implications for Diagnosis and Therapy.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oxidative stress and cellular senescence (OSCS) have great impacts on the occurrence and progression of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This study was intended to construct a prognostic model based on oxidative stress and cellular senescence related difference expression genes (OSCSRDEGs) for TNBC. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases and two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were used to identify OSCSRDEGs. The relationship between OSCSRDEGs and immune infiltration was examined using single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), ESTIMATE, and the CIBERSORT algorithm. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses, Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were employed to construct a prognostic model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, nomograms, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the prognostic efficacy. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were utilized to explore the potential functions and mechanism. Results: A comprehensive analysis identified a total of 27 OSCSRDEGs, out of which 15 genes selected for development of a prognostic model. A high degree of statistical significance was observed for the riskscores derived from this model to accurately predict TNBC Overall survival. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and ROC curve analysis further confirmed the superior accuracy of the OSCSRDEGs prognostic model in predicting efficacy. Notably, the nomogram analysis highlighted that DMD exhibited the highest utility within the model. In comparison between high and low OSCScore groups, the infiltration abundance of immune cells was statistically different in the TCGA-TNBC dataset. Conclusion: These studies have effectively identified four essential OSCSRDEGs (CFI, DMD, NDRG2, and NRP1) and meticulously developed an OSCS-associated prognostic model for individuals diagnosed with TNBC. These discoveries have the potential to significantly contribute to the comprehension of the involvement of OSCS in TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.