ArticleHeliyon2024
COVID-19 infection triggered idiopathic capillary leak syndrome treated with ECMELLA.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful Management of Systemic Capillary Leak Syndrome Secondary to Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mimicking the Course of Fulminant Myocarditis by Venous-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Incomplete systemic capillary leak syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination: a case-based review.Central-European journal of immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic systemic capillary leak syndrome (ISCLS) is characterized by recurrent systemic capillary leakage and hypovolemic shock. Case presentation: We report a 59-year-old Caucasian man with ISCLS and persistent hypovolemic and cardiogenic shock after COVID-19 infection. Mechanical circulatory support was provided with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and a microaxial pump. Massive fluid resuscitation was needed. Subsequent complications prolonged the intensive care treatment. Mechanical circulatory support was needed for 22 days. Cardiac function eventually fully recovered, and the patient survived without neurologic compromise. Conclusions: This case of severe ISCLS triggered by COVID-19 highlights that even the most severe hypovolemic and cardiogenic shock may be reversible in ISCLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.