Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130389›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

Incidence and Risk Factors for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Its Impact on Outcome in Patients Admitted to Medical Critical Care.

Adhiti Krishnamoorthy, Samuel G Hansdak, John V Peter, Kishore Pichamuthu, Sudha J Rajan, Thomas I Sudarsan, Sridhar Gibikote, Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan, Thambu D Sudarsanam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adhiti KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4338-6358
Samuel G HansdakDepartment of Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-1220
John V PeterDepartment of Critical Care, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3423-1830
Kishore PichamuthuDepartment of Medical Intensive Care Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-1183
Sudha J RajanDepartment of Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4852-9301
Thomas I SudarsanDepartment of Critical Care, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0175-6630
Sridhar GibikoteDepartment of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8099-6765
Lakshmanan JeyaseelanDepartment of Biostatistics, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences College of Medicine, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9090-3005
Thambu D SudarsanamDepartment of Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7283-7836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the incidence and risk factors for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) while on thromboprophylaxis, in patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU), and to assess its impact on outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to the MICU underwent compression ultrasound of the jugular, axillary, femoral, and popliteal veins at admission, day 3 and 7 to screen for DVT. All patients were on pharmacological and/or mechanical thromboprophylaxis as per protocol. The primary outcome was the incidence of DVT (defined as occurrence on day 3 or 7). Secondary outcomes were death and duration of hospitalization. Risk factors for DVT were explored using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The incidence of DVT was 17.2% (95% CI 12.0, 22.3) ( Conclusions: Despite thromboprophylaxis, 17% of ICU patients develop DVT. The central venous catheter is the main risk factor. DVT is not associated with increased mortality in the setting of prophylaxis. How to cite this article: Krishnamoorthy A, Hansdak SG, Peter JV, Pichamuthu K, Rajan SJ, Sudarsan TI,

Indexed as

CohortDeep vein thrombosisIntensive care unitMortalityThromboprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID39130389
PMCPMC11310670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.