ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Evaluation of anatomical variants and pathological findings of the maxillary sinus prior to sinus floor elevation: A Cone Beam CT retrospective study in 660 patients.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The significance of maxillary sinus septum height in relation to posterior maxillary alveolar bone height: a retrospective CBCT analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of maxillary sinus septa and predicted Schneiderian membrane perforation risk: a cone beam computed tomography study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maxillary sinuses may present a wide spectrum of anatomical variations and pathological lesions whose recognition is mandatory for the clinician, especially prior to any surgical intervention in the area, such as in cases of sinus floor elevation. The goal of this study was the evaluation, mapping and prevalence of sinus anatomical variants and pathoses in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans of dental patients. Material and Methods: 660 CBCT examinations of adult patients involving both sinuses were obtained (between 2017 and 2023) and analyzed. The following anatomic variants and pathologic findings were evaluated: antral septa (AS), posterior superior alveolar artery (PSAA), sinus hypoplasia, sinusitis, odontogenic cysts, retention cysts, antroliths, and various less common lesions (e.g.: benign fibro-osseous dysplastic lesions, neoplasms etc.). Investigation of the association of the findings with patients' age and gender was performed using the Chi-square test (X2), Fisher's exact test, t-test, and ANOVA (P<0.05). Differences in prevalence between findings, based on their location (right and/or left sinus), were investigated using z-test and t-test. Results: AS were found in 38.6%, and PSAA was identifiable in 90.2% (mean distance from the sinus floor=6.44 mm) of the patients respectively. 3% of patients had hypoplasia, 15.6% sinusitis, 2.7% odontogenic cysts, 16.1% retention cysts, 8.6% antroliths, and 1.7% uncommon lesions (e.g. malignant neoplasms and fibrous dysplasia). A statistically significant association was found between gender and PSAA diameter, PSAA distance from the sinus floor, hypoplasia, sinusitis, and retention cysts, as well as a statistically significant association between age and PSSA diameter and sinusitis. Conclusions: The prevalence of various anatomical variants and pathologic findings of the maxillary sinus did not differ based on their location. However, some of these findings appear to be related to either gender or age. CBCT is a valuable diagnostic tool to identify various anatomical variants and pathological findings of the maxillary sinus.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.