Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39130189›Full record

ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2024

The Role of Verbal Auditory Hallucinations in Influencing and Retrospectively Predicting Physical Harm Prevalence in Early Psychosis.

Cassie M Hazell, Sophia Hasapopoulos, Jennifer McGowan, Roman Hamza, Zareena Ahmed, Ben Gaughan, Monica Huerga Malillos, Amber Gill, Amber Nomani, Emily Hickson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Cassie M HazellDepartment of Psychological Interventions, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Sophia HasapopoulosDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Jennifer McGowanDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Roman HamzaDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Zareena AhmedDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Ben GaughanHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.
Monica Huerga MalillosHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.
Amber GillHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.
Amber NomaniHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.
Emily HicksonHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.
Anjeza KoruniHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.
Faaisa IslamHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.
Jonathan SourayHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.
David RauneHarrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research has established a relationship between psychosis and physical harm in the early course of psychosis. However, little is known about the relationship between specific psychosis symptoms, such as hearing voices, and physical harm. Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and typology of physical harm related to hearing voices, as well as what aspects of the voice-hearing experience retrospectively predicted incidents of harm within an Early Intervention in Psychosis Service (EIPS). Methods: We conducted a quality improvement project in a single EIPS. We reviewed case notes of patients and extracted information on the cognitive-phenomenological features of the voices patients heard, as well as any incidents of physical harm that were causally linked to these voices. Results: It was found that 32.2% of EI patients had an actual incident of physical harm in their case notes that was causally linked to hearing voices. The most common type of physical harm was neglect. In terms of cognitive phenomenological binary correlations that retrospectively predicted physical harm in the case notes, patients were 20 and 7 times more likely to have harmed themselves if they heard self-harm commands ( Conclusion: Verbal auditory hallucinations commonly influence physical harm in the early course of psychosis. Hearing commands and/or believing the voice to be omnipotent are strong retrospective-correlative predictors that may aid in the assessment and therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

Early intervention in psychosisFirst episode psychosisPhysical harmPsychosisQuality improvement projectViolence

Identifiers

PMID39130189
PMCPMC11311800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.