ArticleAIP advances2024
NeuroRoots, a bio-inspired, seamless brain machine interface for long-term recording in delicate brain regions.
Abstract read
In one paragraph
Article in AIP advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinspired organic materials for seamless neurohybrid interfaces: from material design to living electronics.Materials horizons · 2026Review
- PolyGraph - Flexible, Biocompatible & Electrically Optimized Graphene-Polymer Composites for Next-Generation Neural Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance identification tags for ultra-flexible electrodes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multi-Channel Neural Interface for Neural Recording and Neuromodulation.Small methods · 2026Review
- PEDOT:PSS-A Key Material for Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Bidirectional mechanisms and emerging strategies for implantable bioelectronic interfaces.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Multi-Mode Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Football Impact Monitoring and Mechanical Energy Harvesting.ChemistryOpen · 2025Article
- Enhancing biocompatibility of the brain-machine interface: A review.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Neuronal activity in the ventral tegmental area during goal-directed navigation recorded by low-curvature microelectrode arrays.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- The future of transcranial ultrasound as a precision brain interface.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Flexible multimaterial fibers in modern biomedical applications.National science review · 2024Review
- Months-long tracking of neuronal ensembles spanning multiple brain areas with Ultra-Flexible Tentacle Electrodes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- T-DOpE probes reveal sensitivity of hippocampal oscillations to cannabinoids in behaving mice.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A self-stiffening compliant intracortical microprobe.Biomedical microdevices · 2024Article
- Implantable intracortical microelectrodes: reviewing the present with a focus on the future.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Review
- Longitudinal neural and vascular recovery following ultraflexible neural electrode implantation in aged mice.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- A Light-Tolerant Wireless Neural Recording IC for Motor Prediction With Near-Infrared-Based Power and Data Telemetry.IEEE journal of solid-state circuits · 2022Article
- jULIEs: nanostructured polytrodes for low traumatic extracellular recordings and stimulation in the mammalian brain.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
- Learning from the brain's architecture: bioinspired strategies towards implantable neural interfaces.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Marc D FerroDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2409-7113
Christopher M ProctorElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FA, United Kingdom.
Alexander GonzalezDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7328-9533
Sriram JayabalDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-6725
Eric ZhaoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7196-2934
Maxwell GagnonDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3849-1699
Andrea SléziaMultimodal Neurotechnology Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Research Network, 1117 Budapest, Magyar tudósok körútja 2., Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-3169
Jolien PasDepartment of Bioelectronics, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines, CMP-EMSE, 13541 Gardanne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8017-7759
Gerwin DijkDepartment of Bioelectronics, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines, CMP-EMSE, 13541 Gardanne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2482-9828
Mary J DonahueLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, 60221, Sweden.
Adam WilliamsonORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5632-0084
Jennifer RaymondDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-747X
George G MalliarasElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-8501
Lisa GiocomoDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-2528
Nicholas A MeloshDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2601-1379
Funding
VESTIBULAR AND VISUAL CONTROL OF EYE MOVEMENTR01DC004154 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDMAN, MARK S, RAYMOND, JENNIFER L · 1999 to 2025
$9.6MInstructive Signals for Motor LearningR01NS072406 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer L Raymond · 2010 to 2026
$7.6MThe Ionic Basis of Spatial Codes in Medial Entorhinal CortexR01MH106475 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA · 2015 to 2019
$2.0MSelf-Motile Electrodes for Three Dimensional, Non-perturbative Recording and StimulationR21EY026365 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MELOSH, NICHOLAS A · 2015 to 2016
$474kMassively parallel microwire arrays for deep brain stimulationR21NS104861 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DING, JUN · 2018 to 2019
$434kSpatial Codes Across the Medial Entorhinal Cortex for Memory and NavigationR56MH106475 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA · 2020 to 2020
$398kNEI NIH HHS R21 EY026365NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004154NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106475NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH106475NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072406NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS104861
Abstract
Scalable electronic brain implants with long-term stability and low biological perturbation are crucial technologies for high-quality brain-machine interfaces that can seamlessly access delicate and hard-to-reach regions of the brain. Here, we created "NeuroRoots," a biomimetic multi-channel implant with similar dimensions (7
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390
Registered trials
None linked
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.