ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Frequency of Electrocardiogram-Defined Cardiac Conduction Disorders in a Multi-Institutional Primary Care Cohort.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart Disease in Older Women: Unique Challenges in Diagnosis and Management.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- The cardiac conduction system: development, function and therapeutic targets.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Genomic Structural Equation Modeling Combined With Post-GWAS Analysis Identifies Two Risk Gene Loci and Functionally Sensitive Genes Associated With Cardiac Conduction Block.Genetics research · 2026Article
- Diagnoses and outcomes of patients referred for FDG PET/CT for suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.International journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography for Complete Heart Block Risk Stratification.JAMA cardiology · 2025Article
- Trends in cardiac conduction disorder-associated mortality among young adults in the United States, 2010-2020.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Cardiac Conduction Disorders Due to Acquired or Genetic Causes in Young Adults: A Review of the Current Literature.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Time-Weighted Cumulative High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Cardiac Conduction Block: Findings from a Prospective Cohort.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Progress in Cardiac Conduction Disease and the Emergence of Artificial Intelligence in Epidemiological Research.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Disorders affecting cardiac conduction are associated with substantial morbidity. Understanding the epidemiology and risk factors for conduction disorders may enable earlier diagnosis and preventive efforts. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to quantify contemporary frequency and risk factors for electrocardiogram (ECG)-defined cardiac conduction disorders in a large multi-institutional primary care sample. Methods: We quantified prevalence and incidence of conduction disorders among adults receiving longitudinal primary care between 2001 and 2019, each with at least one 12-lead ECG performed prior to the start of follow-up and at least one ECG during follow-up. We defined conduction disorders using curated terms extracted from ECG diagnostic statements by cardiologists. We grouped conduction disorders by inferred anatomic location of abnormal conduction. We tested associations between clinical factors and incident conduction disease using multivariable proportional hazards regression. Results: We analyzed 189,163 individuals (median age 55 years; 58% female). The overall prevalence of conduction disorders was 27% among men and 15% among women. Among 119,926 individuals (median age 55 years; 51% female), 6,802 developed an incident conduction system abnormality over a median of 10 years (Q1, Q3: 6, 15 years) of follow-up. Incident conduction disorders were more common in men (8.78 events/1,000 person-years) vs women (4.34 events/1,000 person-years, Conclusions: Cardiac conduction disorders are common in a primary care population, especially among older individuals with cardiovascular risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.