ReviewJACC. Advances2024
Review in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of patient decision aids for cardiovascular decisions: systematic review with sex/gender-based analysis.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Decision-making for older adults with advanced heart disease: a framework for balancing benefit versus futility.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Consensus and disparities in perspectives on congenital heart disease management between interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons in China.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Shared decision-making for preventive sports cardiology in youth with heart disease: a pilot study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Pathways to the Quintuple Aim: The Role of Advanced Practice Clinicians in Valvular Heart Disease.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Core Competencies of the Modern Geriatric Cardiologist: A Framework for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Care in Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Initial conceptual development of a pilot questionnaire for patient-perceived clinical inertia in chronic disease management: an exploratory study with a predominantly Peruvian sample.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Impact of a Clinical Valve Coordinator on Hospital Length of Stay and Patient Outcomes: Results From the BENCHMARK Registry.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- The continuum of prevention and heart failure in cardiovascular medicine: A joint scientific statement from the Heart Failure Society of America and the American Society for Preventive Cardiology.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
- Management of Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC: Heart Failure Position Statement.JACC. Heart failure · 2025Review
- Shared decision-making for kidney replacement therapy: a comprehensive review and a proposed model.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
- A path forward for the implementation of shared decision-making in valvular heart disease: global joint recommendations from clinicians, patients and researchers.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Article
- Building Structural Heart TEAMS.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Advancing the Contemporary Multidisciplinary Heart Valve Team: Update on Priorities for Clinicians and Programs.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025Review
- Cardiac rhythm devices in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - role, timing, and optimal use in contemporary practice. European Journal of Heart Failure expert consensus document.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- Parental experiences and support needs following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: a qualitative study across the continuum of care in Turkey.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- An Update on the Role of Renal Artery Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Geriatric management and TAVI: time to change from "Heart Team" to "Patient Team".European geriatric medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) and multidisciplinary team-based care delivery are recommended across several cardiology clinical practice guidelines. However, evidence for benefit and guidance on implementation are limited. Informed consent, the use of patient decision aids, or the documentation of these elements for governmental or societal agencies may be conflated as SDM. SDM is a bidirectional exchange between experts: patients are the experts on their goals, values, and preferences, and clinicians provide their expertise on clinical factors. In this Expert Panel perspective, we review the current state of SDM in team-based cardiovascular care and propose best practice recommendations for multidisciplinary team implementation of SDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.