ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Sex Differences in Ventricular Arrhythmias and Adverse Outcomes Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Ventricular Arrhythmias.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Time-Trends in Case-Fatality After Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Middle-Aged Lithuanian Adults, 2000-2023: Data from the Population-Based Kaunas Ischemic Heart Disease Register.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Mortality trends involving fatal-arrhythmias and anemia in the United States: A retrospective analysis of 25 years.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Clinical value analysis of long non-coding RNA PVT1 in the diagnosis and prognosis, of acute myocardial infarction with arrhythmia.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Value and validation of a nomogram model based on the Charlson comorbidity index for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular arrhythmias.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a common cause of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Studies have shown sex differences in the incidence, presentation, and outcomes of AMI. However, less is known about sex differences in patients with AMI who develop VAs. Objectives: The authors assessed sex differences in incidence and in-hospital outcomes of patients with AMI and VAs. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2020, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted for AMI with a secondary diagnosis of VAs. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the sex-specific differences in the rates and in-hospital outcomes of VAs post-AMI. Results: We identified 1,543,140 patients admitted with AMI. Of these, (11.3%) 174,565 patients had VAs after AMI. The odds of VAs after AMI were higher among men (12.6% vs 8.8% adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.72; CI: 1.67-1.78; Conclusions: We found important sex differences in the incidence and outcomes of VAs among patients with AMI. Women had lower odds of VAs but worse hospital outcomes overall. In addition, women were less likely to receive ICD. Further studies to address these sex disparities are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.