Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39129988›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Time From Distress Call to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction.

Elisabeth Helen Anna Mills, Amalie Lykkemark Møller, Thomas Engstrøm, Fredrik Folke, Frants Pedersen, Lars Køber, Filip Gnesin, Nertila Zylyftari, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg, Kristian Kragholm and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Elisabeth Helen Anna MillsDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Amalie Lykkemark MøllerDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Thomas EngstrømDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fredrik FolkeDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frants PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars KøberDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Filip GnesinDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Nertila ZylyftariDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Stig Nikolaj Fasmer BlombergCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristian KragholmDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Gunnar GislasonDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Britta JensenPublic Health and Epidemiology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Freddy LippertCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte KragelundDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Helle Collatz ChristensenCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel Porsborg AndersenDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Christian Torp-PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment. Delays in time-to-PCI, kept within guideline recommendations, have seldom been investigated. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the consequences of delay, due to system factors or hospital distance, for the time between last patient distress call and PCI. Methods: Registry-based cohort study including times of first call to medical services, admission and PCI for patients admitted with STEMI in Copenhagen, Denmark (2014-2018). The main combined outcome included death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or heart failure estimated at 30 days and 1 year from event. Outcomes according to time from call to PCI (system delay) and door-to-balloon time were standardized to the STEMI population using multivariate logistic regression. Results: In total, 1,822 STEMI patients (73.5% male, median age 63.3 years [Q1-Q3: 54.6-72.9 years]) called the emergency services ≤72 hours before PCI (1,735, ≤12 hours). The combined endpoint of 1-year cumulative incidence was 13.9% (166/1,196) for patients treated within 120 minutes of the call and 21.2% (89/420) for patients treated later. Standardized 30-day outcomes were 7.33% (95% CI: 5.41%-9.63%) for patients treated <60 minutes, and 11.1% (95% CI: 8.39%-14.2%) for patients treated >120 minutes. Conclusions: The risk of recurrent myocardial infarction, death, and heart failure following PCI treatment of STEMI increases rapidly when delay exceeds 1 hour. This indicates a particular advantage of minimizing time from first contact to PCI.

Indexed as

PCISTEMIsystem delaytime-to-treatment

Identifiers

PMID39129988
PMCPMC11312358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.