ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Causal effects of plasma metabolites on chronic kidney diseases and renal function: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the potential demonstrated by targeted plasma metabolite modulators in halting the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), a lingering uncertainty persists concerning the causal relationship between distinct plasma metabolites and the onset and progression of CKD. Methods: A genome-wide association study was conducted on 1,091 metabolites and 309 metabolite ratios derived from a cohort of 8,299 unrelated individuals of European descent. Employing a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis in conjunction with colocalization analysis, we systematically investigated the associations between these metabolites and three phenotypes: CKD, creatinine-estimated glomerular filtration rate (creatinine-eGFR), and urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR). In the MR analysis, the primary analytical approach employed was inverse variance weighting (IVW), and sensitivity analysis was executed utilizing the MR-Egger method and MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO). Heterogeneity was carefully evaluated through Cochrane's Q test. To ensure the robustness of our MR results, the leave-one-out method was implemented, and the strength of causal relationships was subjected to scrutiny via Bonferroni correction. Results: Our thorough MR analysis involving 1,400 plasma metabolites and three clinical phenotypes yielded a discerning identification of 21 plasma metabolites significantly associated with diverse outcomes. Specifically, in the forward MR analysis, 6 plasma metabolites were determined to be causally associated with CKD, 16 with creatinine-eGFR, and 7 with UACR. Substantiated by robust evidence from colocalization analysis, 6 plasma metabolites shared causal variants with CKD, 16 with creatinine-eGFR, and 7 with UACR. In the reverse analysis, a diminished creatinine-eGFR was linked to elevated levels of nine plasma metabolites. Notably, no discernible associations were observed between other plasma metabolites and CKD, creatinine-eGFR, and UACR. Importantly, our analysis detected no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy. Conclusion: This study elucidates specific plasma metabolites causally associated with CKD and renal functions, providing potential targets for intervention. These findings contribute to an enriched understanding of the genetic underpinnings of CKD and renal functions, paving the way for precision medicine applications and therapeutic strategies aimed at impeding disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.