ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Lesions: Long-Term Sex-Specific Outcomes.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treating Women With Calcified Coronary Arteries Using Intravascular Lithotripsy: Primary Results of the EMPOWER CAD Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Equity in Modifying Plaque of Women With Undertreated Calcified Coronary Artery Disease: Design and Rationale of EMPOWER CAD study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Seek First to Understand: Sex-Specific Outcomes of Patients With Calcified Coronary Arteries Treated With Intravascular Lithotripsy.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2025
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for calcified lesion preparation prior to drug-eluting stent placement has high procedural success and safety, especially in women, whereas other atheroablative approaches are associated with increased procedural complications. We sought to investigate long-term sex-based outcomes of IVL-facilitated stenting. Methods: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of the single-arm Disrupt CAD III and IV studies. Patient baseline, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were examined according to sex at 30 days and 1 year. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Target lesion failure was defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Results: A total of 448 patients, 106 (24%) women, were included. Women were older and less likely to be smokers. Women had smaller reference vessel diameters (2.8 mm vs 3.1 mm), shorter lesion length (23.6 mm vs 27.1 mm), and shorter total calcified length (44.4 mm vs 49.3 mm) compared with men. Post-IVL angiographic outcomes and complications were similar between women and men. At 1 year, major adverse cardiac event rates (12.3% vs 13.2%, Conclusions: Use of IVL in the treatment of severely calcified lesions is associated with low rates of adverse clinical events and with similar safety and effectiveness in women and men at 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.