ArticleSensors & diagnostics2024
Fast and accurate identification of pathogenic bacteria using excitation-emission spectroscopy and machine learning.
Article in Sensors & diagnostics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial species differentiation via real-time detection of microbial volatile organic compounds using a wavelength multiplexed photoionization detector and AI image-based analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Species-specific discrimination of bacterial biofilms using a ratiometric fluorescence sensor array and machine learning.Sensors & diagnostics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fast and reliable identification of pathogenic bacteria is of upmost importance to human health and safety. Methods that are currently used in clinical practice are often time consuming, require expensive equipment, trained personnel, and therefore have limited applications in low resource environments. Molecular identification methods address some of these shortcomings. At the same time, they often use antibodies, their fragments, or other biomolecules as recognition units, which makes such tests specific to a particular target. In contrast, array-based methods use a combination of reporters that are not specific to a single pathogen. These methods provide a more data-rich and universal response that can be used for identification of a variety of bacteria of interest. In this report, we demonstrate the application of the excitation-emission spectroscopy of an environmentally sensitive fluorescent dye for identification of pathogenic bacterial species. 2-(4'-Dimethylamino)-3-hydroxyflavone (DMAF) interacts with the bacterial cell envelope resulting in a distinct spectral response that is unique to each bacterial species. The dynamics of dye-bacteria interaction were thoroughly investigated, and the limits of detection and identification were determined. Neural network classification algorithm was used for pattern recognition analysis and classification of spectral data. The sensor successfully discriminated between eight representative pathogenic bacteria, achieving a classification accuracy of 85.8% at the species level and 98.3% at the Gram status level. The proposed method based on excitation-emission spectroscopy of an environmentally sensitive fluorescent dye is a powerful and versatile diagnostic tool with high accuracy in identification of bacterial pathogens.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.