Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39129850›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes after Retroglandular Breast Implant Explantation.

Patrícia J Maciel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Revision Mastopexy in Aesthetic Breast Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrícia J MacielFrom Instituto de Cirurgia Plástica Santa Cruz and Private Practice Prime Saúde e Bem- estar, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety of silicone breast implants has been questioned due to concerns such as the risk of associated lymphoma, as well as rheumatological and systemic symptoms. This has resulted in an increased demand for explantation, posing the challenge of addressing stigmas related to implant removal. There is a dearth of literature on techniques for restoring breast contour postexplantation. After implant removal, the original breast anatomy is altered, and depressed areas may manifest in random locations. To reposition the breast tissue displaced by the implant, we enlarge the retroglandular pocket and subsequently use sutures for centripetal traction, relocating the tissue back to the footprint area but now in an improved position, delineating the breast contour. This maneuver enables us to restore the breast contour to an anatomical condition akin to preimplantation; diminish the final explantation defect, creating a more suitable pocket for delicate mastopexy flaps; recruit breast tissue, allowing internal sutures to conceal tissue irregularities; and redesign the breast contour area on the chest to achieve better symmetry.

Identifiers

PMID39129850
PMCPMC11315498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.