Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39129849›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Prompt, Objective, and Accurate Measurement of Rat Abdominal Flap Blood Flow Using Laser Speckle Flowgraphy.

Kazuhiro Tsunekawa, Ikkei Takashimizu, Shunsuke Yuzuriha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kazuhiro TsunekawaFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan.
Ikkei TakashimizuFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan.
Shunsuke YuzurihaFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The indications for free flap procedures have expanded, with recent technical advances enhancing procedural safety. However, few objective indicators exist to monitor flap status during and after the operation. This experimental study assessed laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) as a prompt and accurate indicator of free flap blood flow. Methods: After elevating bilateral lower abdomen flaps with superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and superficial inferior epigastric vein vasculature in Wistar rats, the right flap with the SIEA was cut (ischemic group) or the superficial inferior epigastric vein was cut (congestive group), and the unaltered left flaps were monitored using LSFG every 5 minutes for a 30-minute period. Flap survival or necrosis was assessed after 7 days. Results: In the ischemic group, LSFG measurements were significantly lower after cutting the SIEA than beforehand (74% at 5 minutes and 72% at 30 minutes). Similar findings were seen in the congestive group (63% at 5 minutes and 55% at 30 minutes). LSFG measurements were significantly lower in the congestive group than in the ischemic group. Seven days afterward, whereas all right-side flaps with cut vessels were necrotic, all unaltered left-side flaps had survived. Conclusions: Our preliminary results demonstrated that LSFG could objectively identify abnormal blood flow in skin flaps as early as 5 minutes into surgery and predict graft survival. LSFG may potentially enable quick and objective assessment of flap blood flow and reduce the risk of complications and flap loss.

Identifiers

PMID39129849
PMCPMC11315587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.