ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Outcomes of Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Free Flap Reconstruction in Acute Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Free flap reconstruction in acute burns is high risk but often required for limb salvage and coverage of vital structures. Prior studies have shown a flap loss rate up to 44%. This study aimed to compare the complications associated with muscle and fasciocutaneous free flaps in acute burn reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered on the PROSPERO database (CDR42023471088). The databases accessed were Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was free flap failure rate based on flap type. Secondary outcomes included venous congestion, arterial thrombosis, amputation, and need for reintervention. Results: Twelve studies with 181 free flaps were included: 87 muscle flaps and 94 fasciocutaneous flaps. Muscle flaps had a higher risk ratio (RR) for total flap loss [RR: 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-5.32, Conclusions: Muscle flaps in burn injuries are associated with higher risks of flap failure, arterial thrombosis, and amputations. Fasciocutaneous free flaps in acute burns seem to be safer with better outcomes, though further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.