ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Free Flap Failure and Contracture Recurrence in Delayed Burn Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes of Microsurgical Reconstruction of Post-Burn Joint Contracture-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Microsurgery · 2025Pooled it
- Free Flap Reconstruction for Burn Injuries: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparison of Primary and Secondary Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of role of rhomboid flap and double Z-plasty in post-burn contractures: A prospective case series in Iraq.Scars, burns & healingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Free tissue transfer is often considered a last resort in burn reconstruction due to its complexity and associated risks. A comprehensive review on free flap outcomes in delayed burn reconstruction is currently lacking. The study aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the failure and contracture recurrence rates in free flap delayed burn reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023404478). The following databases were accessed: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The measured outcomes were free flap loss and contracture recurrence rate. Results: Of the 1262 retrieved articles, 40 qualified for inclusion, reporting on 1026 free flaps performed in 928 patients. The mean age was 29.25 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 24.63-33.88]. Delayed burn reconstruction was performed at an average of 94.68 months [95% CI, - 9.34 to 198.70] after initial injury, with a follow-up period of 23.02 months [95% CI, 4.46-41.58]. Total flap loss rate was 3.80% [95% CI, 2.79-5.16] and partial flap loss rate was 5.95% [95% CI, 4.65-7.57]. Interestingly, burn contracture recurrence rate was 0.62% [95% CI, 0.20-1.90]. Conclusions: This systematic review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the free flap outcomes in delayed burn reconstruction. The flap loss rate was relatively low, given the complexity of the procedure and potential risks. Furthermore, burn contracture rate was found to be extremely low. This study demonstrates that free flaps are a safe and effective option for delayed burn reconstruction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.