Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39129840›Full record

ArticleCognitive computation2024

Neurodynamical Computing at the Information Boundaries of Intelligent Systems.

Joseph D Monaco, Grace M Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph D MonacoDept of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0792-8322
Grace M HwangJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3335-8688

Funding

A Neural Systems Approach to Understanding the Dynamic Computations Underlying our Sense of DirectionUF1NS111695 · NINDS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TAUBE, JEFFREY STEVEN, VAN DER MEER, MATTHIJS · 2019 to 2019
$3.0M
Spiking network models of sharp-wave ripple sequences with gamma-locked attractor dynamicsR03NS109923 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, KECHEN · 2018 to 2019
$164k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS109923NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS111695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has not achieved defining features of biological intelligence despite models boasting more parameters than neurons in the human brain. In this perspective article, we synthesize historical approaches to understanding intelligent systems and argue that methodological and epistemic biases in these fields can be resolved by shifting away from cognitivist brain-as-computer theories and recognizing that brains exist within large, interdependent living systems. Integrating the dynamical systems view of cognition with the massive distributed feedback of perceptual control theory highlights a theoretical gap in our understanding of nonreductive neural mechanisms. Cell assemblies-properly conceived as reentrant dynamical flows and not merely as identified groups of neurons-may fill that gap by providing a minimal supraneuronal level of organization that establishes a neurodynamical base layer for computation. By considering information streams from physical embodiment and situational embedding, we discuss this computational base layer in terms of conserved oscillatory and structural properties of cortical-hippocampal networks. Our synthesis of embodied cognition, based in dynamical systems and perceptual control, aims to bypass the neurosymbolic stalemates that have arisen in artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and computational neuroscience.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceComputational neuroscienceDynamical systemsEmbodied cognitionPerceptual control theoryRobotics

Identifiers

PMID39129840
PMCPMC11306504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.