ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
Safe and Effective Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in the Outpatient Setting: The Michigan Medicine Experience.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Discharge After Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Evolution and New Perspectives of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in CTEPH.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Same-Day Discharge Following Outpatient Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty: A Single-Center Experience.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is currently performed at select centers worldwide, with the current standard of practice being postprocedural inpatient monitoring for 24 to 72 hours. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BPA in a cohort of patients with chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and outline a protocol for implementation in the outpatient setting. Methods: All patients with distal, inoperable CTEPH, residual symptoms after pulmonary endarterectomy, or symptomatic CTEPD from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022, were evaluated by a multidisciplinary chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension team for consideration of BPA. Patients undergoing each BPA session adhered to a regimented protocol developed and implemented at our institution. Safety and efficacy were retrospectively evaluated with a mean follow-up time of 8.5 months. Results: Eighteen patients underwent a total of 78 BPA sessions. Overall, there was a significant improvement in World Health Organization functional class and mean improvement in 6-minute walking distance of +67 m. Hemodynamic parameters significantly improved with a mean decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance of 7.3 ± 5.8 mm Hg and 1.7 ± 1.5 Wood units, respectively ( Conclusions: BPA is both safe and effective when implemented in the outpatient setting using a regimented protocol provided there are necessary contingencies in place.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.