ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024
Comparative Analysis of Non-Rigid Registration Techniques for Liver Surface Registration.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-rigid surface-based soft tissue registration is crucial for surgical navigation systems, but its adoption still faces several challenges due to the large number of degrees of freedom and the continuously varying and complex surface structures present in the intra-operative data. By employing non-rigid registration, surgeons can integrate the pre-operative images into the intra-operative guidance environment, providing real-time visualization of the patient's complex pre- and intra-operative anatomy in a common coordinate system to improve navigation accuracy. However, many of the existing registration methods, including those for liver applications, are inaccessible to the broader community. To address this limitation, we present a comparative analysis of several open-source, non-rigid surface-based liver registration algorithms, with the overall goal of contrasting their strength and weaknesses and identifying an optimal solution. We compared the robustness of three optimization-based and one data-driven nonrigid registration algorithms in response to a reduced visibility ratio (reduced partial views of the surface) and to an increasing deformation level (mean displacement), reported as the root mean square error (RMSE) between the pre-and intra-operative liver surface meshed following registration. Our results indicate that the Gaussian Mixture Model - Finite Element Model (GMM-FEM) method consistently yields a lower post-registration error than the other three tested methods in the presence of both reduced visibility ratio and increased intra-operative surface displacement, therefore offering a potentially promising solution for pre- to intra-operative nonrigid liver surface registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.