ArticleActas espanolas de psiquiatria2024
The Correlation between Depression during Pregnancy and Metabolic Syndrome.
Article in Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Antepartum Depression Symptoms: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, the incidence of depression during pregnancy has gradually increased, and the disorder of lipid metabolism in patients with depression is an important research direction. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the correlation between depression during pregnancy and metabolic syndrome (MS).
methodsA total of 113 pregnant women diagnosed as depression during pregnancy from November 2019 to January 2022 were selected as the observation group. After excluding 3 cases, 110 cases were finally included. And 102 pregnant women who were not diagnosed as depression during pregnancy in the same period were selected as the control group. After excluding 2 cases, 100 cases were finally included for comparative study. The levels of various parameters, including serum triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), C-reactive protein (CRP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used to evaluate the depression scores of postpartum women. Additionally, the correlation between EPDS scores and clinical indexes was assessed in patients with depression during pregnancy.
resultsWe observed that the body weight, EPDS score, the proportion of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were significantly higher in the observation group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the observation group exhibited significantly higher levels of TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, FPG, CRP, SBP, and DBP than the control group (p < 0.001). Pearson linear correlation analysis revealed that TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, FPG, CRP, SBP, and DBP levels were positively correlated with EPDS scores (p < 0.001).
conclusionThis study indicates a specific correlation between MS and depression during pregnancy, and MS-related indicators are positively correlated with EPDS scores among these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.