ArticleActa ophthalmologica2025
Prioritizations in Swedish cataract surgery - when resources are limited-Exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prioritizations in Swedish cataract surgery - when resources are limited-Exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study the prioritization effects of the of COVID-19 pandemic on Swedish cataract surgery using a national healthcare registry with high coverage.
settingA study from the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR), involving all patients undergoing cataract surgery in Sweden during 2019-2022 - before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
resultsWith the pandemic outbreak, the number of cataract surgeries fell by 22% in 2020 (15 369 procedures), albeit with large regional differences (-43% to +58%). The numbers recovered in 2021, and in 2022, a new top notation was seen (n = 149 952). On a national level, the patients were younger (-0.46 years, p < 0.001), with a larger proportion of less difficult cases (p < 0.001) and the proportion of males was higher (p < 0.001) during the pandemic, but all these variables also differed substantially between different regions and clinics.
conclusionA national registry with high coverage can map the consequences of an event disrupting elective surgery in detail. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact on Swedish cataract surgery varied largely between different regions, clinics, and healthcare providers, leading to inequality in the availability of surgery. These differences likely owed to variations in healthcare policy approaches in different parts of the country. The present study shows that outcomes at one clinic or region cannot be extrapolated to larger regions under these circumstances. It actualizes the need to aim for a healthcare on equal terms, but it also shows a system that delivers care to many despite difficult times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.