ArticleCirculation2024
High-Throughput Deep Learning Detection of Mitral Regurgitation.
Article in Circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- AI echo INSIGHT study: A prospective blinded randomized trial of artificial intelligence echocardiogram interpretation.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- AI-augmented cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound: a narrative review for pulmonary and critical care clinicians.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Pre-anaesthetic risk assessment and management of dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease: a spectrum of care narrative review.The Journal of small animal practice · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in echocardiography: a position statement from the British Society of Echocardiography.Echo research and practice · 2026Review
- Quantification of mitral regurgitation: from traditional methods to artificial intelligence.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in the clinical management and prognostication of mitral regurgitation: a systematic review.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Review
- Detection of Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction From Standard B-Mode Echocardiogram Videos Using Deep Learning.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Automated echocardiographic detection of mitral valve prolapse and mitral regurgitation with video-based artificial intelligence algorithms.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Measuring atrioventricular valve regurgitation in Fontan patients using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and the association with clinical outcomes: A FORCE Study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026Article
- Mitral regurgitation detection and central/eccentric classification using transformer-based deep learning in multi-view echocardiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Automated Classification of Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation With Explainability and Real-World Practice Experience.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- EchoAtlas: A Conversational, Multi-View Vision-Language Foundation Model for Echocardiography Interpretation and Clinical Reasoning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automated Phenotyping of Mitral Stenosis Using Deep Learning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Mitral Valve Prolapse and Mitral Regurgitation with Video-based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced echocardiography in cardiovascular disease management.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Article
- The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease with Cardiac Imaging.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Leveraging Single-Cell Technologies to Advance Understanding of Myocardial Disease.Circulation research · 2026Review
- Machine learning and multi-omics technologies for precision cardiovascular medicine: advancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and therapeutic guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosis of mitral regurgitation (MR) requires careful evaluation by echocardiography with Doppler imaging. This study presents the development and validation of a fully automated deep learning pipeline for identifying apical 4-chamber view videos with color Doppler echocardiography and detecting clinically significant (moderate or severe) MR from transthoracic echocardiograms.
methodsA total of 58 614 transthoracic echocardiograms (2 587 538 videos) from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center were used to develop and test an automated pipeline to identify apical 4-chamber view videos with color Doppler across the mitral valve and then assess MR severity. The model was tested internally on a test set of 1800 studies (80 833 videos) from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and externally evaluated in a geographically distinct cohort of 915 studies (46 890 videos) from Stanford Healthcare.
resultsIn the held-out Cedars-Sinai Medical Center test set, the view classifier demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.998 (0.998-0.999) and correctly identified 3452 of 3539 echocardiography videos as having color Doppler information across the mitral valve (sensitivity of 0.975 [0.968-0.982] and specificity of 0.999 [0.999-0.999] compared with manually curated videos). In the external test cohort from Stanford Healthcare, the view classifier correctly identified 1051 of 1055 manually curated videos with color Doppler information across the mitral valve (sensitivity of 0.996 [0.990-1.000] and specificity of 0.999 [0.999-0.999]). In the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center test cohort, MR moderate or greater in severity was detected with an AUC of 0.916 (0.899-0.932) and severe MR was detected with an AUC of 0.934 (0.913-0.953). In the Stanford Healthcare test cohort, the model detected MR moderate or greater in severity with an AUC of 0.951 (0.924-0.973) and severe MR with an AUC of 0.969 (0.946-0.987).
conclusionsIn this study, a novel automated pipeline for identifying clinically significant MR from full transthoracic echocardiography studies demonstrated excellent performance across large numbers of studies and across multiple institutions. Such an approach has the potential for automated screening and surveillance of MR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.