ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2024
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccording to the World Health Organization, Microscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing malaria. However, the performance of this examination depends on the experience of the microscopist and the level of parasitemia. Thus, molecular biology detection of malaria could be an alternative technique.
aimevaluate the contribution of molecular biology in detecting imported malaria.
methodsThis was a descriptive, prospective study, including all students, from the Monastir region, and foreigners, from countries endemic to malaria. The study period was from September 2020 to April 2021. Each subject was screened for malaria by three methods: direct microscopic detection of Plasmodium, detection of plasmodial antigens, and detection of plasmodial DNA by nested PCR.
resultsAmong the 127 subjects screened, only one had a positive microscopic examination for Plasmodium falciparum. Among the 126 subjects with a negative microscopic examination, twelve students had a positive nested PCR result, i.e. 9.5%. Molecular sequencing allowed the identification of ten isolates of Plasmodium falciparum, one Plasmodium malariae and one Plasmodium ovale. Our study showed that the results of nested PCR agreed with those of microscopy in 90.6% of cases.
conclusionNested PCR seems more sensitive for the detection of low parasitemias. Hence the importance of including molecular biology as a malaria screening tool to ensure better detection of imported cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.