ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2024
Transitioning to Insulin Analogs in Tunisian Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Efficacy and Safety.
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionthere is a lack of research evaluating the impact of therapeutic switching from human insulin to analogues, particularly in paediatric populations from low- and middle-income countries.
aimThe study aimed to retrospectively assess the effectiveness and safety of transitioning from human insulin to insulin analogs in Tunisian children with diabetes.
methodsThis retrospective descriptive study included children with type 1 diabetes who changed their insulin therapy protocol after at least one year of treatment with human insulin. Clinical, therapeutic, and glycaemic homeostasis parameters were assessed following the transition from human insulin (NPH + rapid-acting insulin) to the Basal-Bolus insulin analog- protocol.
resultsThe study included 60 patients. Following the switch, all patients showed a significant reduction in mean fasting blood glucose levels (11.11 mmol/l vs. 8.62 mmol/l; p=0.024). Glycated haemoglobin A1C levels decreased notably in children who adhered to their diet (from 9.93% to 8.38%; p=0.06) and/or engaged in regular physical activity (from 10.40% to 8.61%; p=0.043). The average number of hypoglycemic events per year decreased from 4.03 events/year to 2.36 events/year (p=0.006), along with a decrease in the rate of patients hospitalized for acid-ketotic decompensation (from 27% to 10%; p=0.001). Financial constraints led to 82% of patients reusing microfine needles ≥2 times per day, and 12% were compelled to revert to the initial insulin therapy protocol due to a lack of access to self-financed microfine needles or discontinued social coverage.
conclusionsAlthough insulin analogues offer clear benefits, their use poses challenges as a therapeutic choice for children with diabetes in low- to middle-income countries. These challenges hinder the achievement of optimal glycemic control goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.