ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024
18F-FDG-PET/CT in breast cancer imaging: Restaging and Implications for treatment decisions in a clinical practice setting.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Positron Emission Tomography in Patients Diagnosed with Different Types of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAlthough the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose - positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) for breast cancer (BC) has been well studied, few studies have evaluated the impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on BC patient care. This study aimed to investigate restaging and 18F-FDG-PET/CT-induced changes in clinical decision-making in patients with BC. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 18F-FDG-PET/CT-scans performed for BC-related indications in a prospectively collected consecutive cohort of adult patients at Skane University Hospital, Sweden. Patients with all BC stages were included and divided into three groups based on the indication for 18F-FDG-PET/CT: Group A (primary staging), Group B (response evaluation), and Group C (recurrence). The impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT-scans on clinical management was categorized as no change, minor change (e.g. modification of treatment plans), or major change (e.g. shift from curative to palliative treatment intention).
resultsA total of 376 scans (151 patients) were included: Group A 9.3% (35 of 376 scans), Group B 77.4% (291 of 376 scans), and Group C 13.3% (50 of 376 scans). Significant stage migration, predominantly upstaging, occurred in Group A (45.7%) and Group C (28.0%). Changes in clinical management were observed in 120 scans (31.9%), of which 66 were major and 54 were minor. The largest proportion of 18F-FDG-PET/CT-induced management changes were observed in Group A (57.1%), most commonly a shift from curative to palliative treatment intention due to upstaging.
interpretationOur study indicates the clinical utility of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in BC restaging and changes in clinical management; the latter observed in approximately one-third of all cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.