Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39129249›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024

Baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil-ratio and outcome in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab.

Yana Beulque, Lisa Kinget, Eduard Roussel, Sajedeh Mobaraki, Annouschka Laenen, Philip R Debruyne, Yannick Van Herck, Marcella Baldewijns, Agnieszka Wozniak, Abhishek D Garg and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Eosinophils in solid cancers: sentinels, predictors, and therapeutic allies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yana BeulqueDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lisa KingetDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eduard RousselDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sajedeh MobarakiDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Annouschka LaenenBiostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, Leuven.
Philip R DebruyneDepartment of General Medical Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Medical Technology Research Centre (MTRC), School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Yannick Van HerckDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marcella BaldewijnsDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Agnieszka WozniakLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abhishek D GargLaboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI), Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jessica Zucman-RossiInserm, UMRS-1138, Génomique fonctionnelle des tumeurs solides, Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
Gabrielle CouchyInserm, UMRS-1138, Génomique fonctionnelle des tumeurs solides, Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
Maarten AlbersenDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Liesbeth De WeverDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lorenz HaakerDepartment of Medical Oncology, AZ Sint Lucas, Brugge, Belgium.
Benoit BeuselinckDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. benoit.beuselinck@uzleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis study aims to evaluate neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) as a prognostic and/or predictive biomarker in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective study on m-ccRCC patients treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab (2012-2022). Baseline NER was calculated and correlated with clinical outcomes: response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Corresponding transcriptomic data were analysed.

resultsWe included 201 m-ccRCC patients, 76 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and 125 with nivolumab. Baseline NER was statistically significantly associated with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Increased NER was associated with shorter PFS and OS in the total patient series and nivolumab-treated patients. In patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab, increased NER was only statistically significantly associated with shorter OS. The impact of baseline NER on PFS and OS was independent of IMDC risk stratification. No clear correlation was found between baseline NER and RECIST response or maximal tumour shrinkage. In two additional databases, NER was also associated with PFS and OS in first-line vascular-endothelial-growth-factor-receptor tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs), but not to disease-free survival in the post-nephrectomy setting. Lower NER was associated with intratumoural molecular features possibly associated with better outcome on immune checkpoint inhibitors.

interpretationLower baseline NER is associated with better PFS and OS, independent of IMDC risk score, in m-ccRCC patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab or nivolumab. It correlates with intratumoural molecular features possibly associated with better outcome on immune checkpoint inhibitors. The predictive power of this biomarker is probably limited and insufficient for patient selection.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellIpilimumabKidney NeoplasmsNeutrophilsNivolumabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID39129249
PMCPMC11332468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.