ArticleClinical oral investigations2024
Development and validation of the Oral Lichen Planus-Disease Activity Scale: a novel tool for comprehensive clinical assessment.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation and Validation of Thai Versions of the Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire-15 and Oral Lichen Planus Symptom Severity Measure.Oral diseases · 2026Article
- Serum Calprotectin Concentration in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Article
- The implant treatment experience and knowledge scale: reliability and validity of a patient-reported outcome measure for dental implant therapy.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate the Oral Lichen Planus-Disease Activity Scale (OLP-DAS) for assessing overall disease activity of OLP.
methodsThe OLP-DAS was created by refining the Thongprasom criteria, incorporating inputs from the literature and expert review, and integrating pain assessment. Content validity was evaluated in a virtual meeting with 8 Oral Medicine specialists. Reliability and validity of the final version were examined. Seventeen OLP subjects were assessed for disease activity by 10 investigators using the OLP-DAS, Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS), OLP-Investigator Global Assessment (OLP-IGA), and Reticular-Erythema-Ulcerative (REU) scale. Convergent validity was assessed by rating 160 OLP subjects using the OLP-DAS, ODSS, and OLP-IGA. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, along with convergent validity, were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (r
resultsThe final OLP-DAS achieved excellent content validity indices. Inter-rater and intra-rater ICCs for total OLP-DAS scores were 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. Total OLP-DAS scores exhibited strong positive correlations with the ODSS and OLP-IGA (r
conclusionsThe OLP-DAS is a valid and reliable clinician-reported outcome measure (CROM) for evaluating OLP disease activity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The OLP-DAS, as a standardized CROM for OLP, is valuable for both routine clinical assessments and research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39129032What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.