Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39128973›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2025

Construction of an assessment scale for thirst severity in critically ill patients and its reliability and validity.

Chunli Liao, Qiongyao Guan, Xiangping Ma, Xueting He, Yan Su, Dandan Fan, Jing Liu, Jinyu Ye, Xifeng He, Pengyu Cui

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chunli LiaoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, China.ORCID 0009-0007-4127-9078
Qiongyao GuanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, China.
Xiangping MaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, China.
Xueting HeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, China.
Yan SuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, China.
Dandan FanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Nursing, Lancang First People's Hospital, Puer, China.
Jinyu YeDepartment of Nursing, Lancang First People's Hospital, Puer, China.
Xifeng HeDepartment of Nursing, Lancang First People's Hospital, Puer, China.
Pengyu CuiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Yunnan Cancer Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University), Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeveloping a severity assessment scale for critically ill patients' thirst and conducting reliability and validity tests, aiming to provide healthcare professionals with a scientific and objective tool for assessing the level of thirst.

methodsBased on literature review and qualitative interviews, a pool of items was generated, and a preliminary scale was formed through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Convenience sampling was employed to select 178 ICU patients in a top-three hospital from May 2023 to October 2023 as the study subjects to examine the reliability and validity of the severity assessment scale for critically ill patients' thirst.

resultsThe developed severity assessment scale for critically ill patients' thirst consists of 8 evaluation items and 26 evaluation indicators. The agreement coefficients for two rounds of expert consultation were 100% and 92.6% for the positive coefficient, and the authority coefficients were .900 and .906. Kendall's concordance coefficients were .101 and .120 (all p < .001). The overall Cronbach's α coefficient for the scale was .827. The inter-rater reliability coefficient was .910. The Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) ranged from .800 to 1.000, and the Scale-Content Validity Index/Average (S-CVI/Ave) was .950.

conclusionThe critically ill patients' thirst assessment scale is reliable and valid and can be widely used in clinical practice. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The AiMi Academic Services (www.aimieditor.com) for English language editing and review services. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The scale developed in this study is a simple and ICU-specific scale that can be used to assess the severity of thirst in critically ill patients. As such, the severity of thirst in critically ill patients can be evaluated quickly so that targeted interventions can be implemented according to the patient's specific disease and treatment conditions. Therefore, patient comfort can be improved, and thirst-related health problems can be prevented.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDehydrationSeverity of Illness IndexThirstAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultassessmentcritically ill patientsdevelopnursingreliabilityscalethirstvalidity

Identifiers

PMID39128973
PMCPMC11808416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.