Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39128933›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Multidisciplinary cancer disease classification using adaptive FL in healthcare industry 5.0.

Tahir Abbas, Areej Fatima, Tariq Shahzad, Meshal Alharbi, Muhammad Adnan Khan, Arfan Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tahir AbbasSchool of Computer Science, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Areej FatimaDepartment of Computer Science, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Tariq ShahzadDepartment of Computer Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, Sahiwal, 57000, Pakistan.
Meshal AlharbiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, 11, 11942, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Adnan KhanDepartment of Software, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, 13557, South Korea. adnan@gachon.ac.kr.
Arfan AhmedAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar. ara4013@qatar-med.cornell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging Industry 5.0 designs promote artificial intelligence services and data-driven applications across multiple places with varying ownership that need special data protection and privacy considerations to prevent the disclosure of private information to outsiders. Due to this, federated learning offers a method for improving machine-learning models without accessing the train data at a single manufacturing facility. We provide a self-adaptive framework for federated machine learning of healthcare intelligent systems in this research. Our method takes into account the participating parties at various levels of healthcare ecosystem abstraction. Each hospital trains its local model internally in a self-adaptive style and transmits it to the centralized server for universal model optimization and communication cycle reduction. To represent a multi-task optimization issue, we split the dataset into as many subsets as devices. Each device selects the most advantageous subset for every local iteration of the model. On a training dataset, our initial study demonstrates the algorithm's ability to converge various hospital and device counts. By merging a federated machine-learning approach with advanced deep machine-learning models, we can simply and accurately predict multidisciplinary cancer diseases in the human body. Furthermore, in the smart healthcare industry 5.0, the results of federated machine learning approaches are used to validate multidisciplinary cancer disease prediction. The proposed adaptive federated machine learning methodology achieved 90.0%, while the conventional federated learning approach achieved 87.30%, both of which were higher than the previous state-of-the-art methodologies for cancer disease prediction in the smart healthcare industry 5.0.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeoplasmsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareHealth Care SectorHumansAdaptive federated learningBrain cancerBreast cancerFederated learningHistopathologyImage processingKidney cancer

Identifiers

PMID39128933
PMCPMC11317485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.