Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39128916›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Global patterns in the growth potential of soil bacterial communities.

Ernest D Osburn, Steven G McBride, Mohammad Bahram, Michael S Strickland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Deep enrichment of soilFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ernest D OsburnDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. e.osburn@uky.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1943-5683
Steven G McBrideDepartment of Biology, Radford University, Radford, VA, USA.
Mohammad BahramDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Michael S StricklandDepartment of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5349-0363

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1845417United States Department of Agriculture | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) 2020-67034-41310Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2021-03724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing catalogue of studies detailing the taxonomic and functional composition of soil bacterial communities, the life history traits of those communities remain largely unknown. This study analyzes a global dataset of soil metagenomes to explore environmental drivers of growth potential, a fundamental aspect of bacterial life history. We find that growth potential, estimated from codon usage statistics, was highest in forested biomes and lowest in arid latitudes. This indicates that bacterial productivity generally reflects ecosystem productivity globally. Accordingly, the strongest environmental predictors of growth potential were productivity indicators, such as distance to the equator, and soil properties that vary along productivity gradients, such as pH and carbon to nitrogen ratios. We also observe that growth potential was negatively correlated with the relative abundances of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, demonstrating tradeoffs between growth and resource acquisition in soil bacteria. Overall, we identify macroecological patterns in bacterial growth potential and link growth rates to soil carbon cycling.

Indexed as

BacteriaCarbonEcosystemSoilSoil MicrobiologyCarbon CycleCodon UsageForestsMetagenomeMicrobiotaNitrogenCarbonNitrogenSoil

Identifiers

PMID39128916
PMCPMC11317499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.