Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39128903›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A cost-sensitive decision model for efficient pooled testing in mass surveillance of infectious diseases like COVID-19.

Shun Fu, Junnan Li, Hao Li, Jie Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shun FuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Chongqing Industry Polytechnic College, Chongqing, 401120, China.
Junnan LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Chongqing Industry Polytechnic College, Chongqing, 401120, China.
Hao LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Chongqing Industry Polytechnic College, Chongqing, 401120, China.
Jie YangSchool of Physics and Electronic Science, Zunyi Normal University, Zunyi, 563002, China. yj530966074@foxmail.com.

Funding

Doctoral Fund of Chongqing Industry Polytechnic College 2023GZYBSZK3-03Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJQN202303203the Excellent Young Scientific and Technological Talents Foundation of Guizhou Province QKH-platform talent [2021] No.5627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed significant challenges on global health, emphasizing the persistent threat of large-scale infectious diseases in the future. This study addresses the need to enhance pooled testing efficiency for large populations. The common approach in pooled testing involves consolidating multiple test samples into a single tube to efficiently detect positivity at a lower cost. However, what is the optimal number of samples to be grouped together in order to minimize costs? i.e. allocating ten individuals per group may not be the most cost-effective strategy. In response, this paper introduces the hierarchical quotient space, an extension of fuzzy equivalence relations, as a method to optimize group allocations. In this study, we propose a cost-sensitive multi-granularity intelligent decision model to further minimize testing costs. This model considers both testing and collection costs, aiming to achieve the lowest total cost through optimal grouping at a single layer. Building upon this foundation, two multi-granularity models are proposed, exploring hierarchical group optimization. The experimental simulations were conducted using MATLAB R2022a on a desktop with Intel i5-10500 CPU and 8G RAM, considering scenarios with a fixed number of individuals and fixed positive probability. The main findings from our simulations demonstrate that the proposed models significantly enhance the efficiency and reduce the overall costs associated with pooled testing. For example, testing costs were reduced by nearly half when the optimal grouping strategy was applied, compared to the traditional method of grouping ten individuals. Additionally, the multi-granularity approach further optimized the hierarchical groupings, leading to substantial cost savings and improved testing efficiency.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDecision Support TechniquesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Cost-sensitiveCOVID-19Fuzzy equivalence relationHierarchical quotient spaceMulti-granularity

Identifiers

PMID39128903
PMCPMC11317522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.