Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39128895›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The study of vaginal wall thickness in adults based on histopathological measurements.

Xinrong Wang, Juan Liu, Juan Zou, Can Luo, Dongmei Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinrong WangDepartment of Pathology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Juan LiuDepartment of Pathology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Juan ZouDepartment of Pathology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Can LuoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Dongmei WeiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. weidongmei@scu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-0296

Funding

Key Research Projects of Sichuan Science and Technology Department No.2023YFG0128,No.2023NSFSC1606National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2021YFC2009100Research Projects of Sichuan Science and Technology Department No.2023YFQ0070Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province No. 2019YFS0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To accurately measure the vaginal mucosa thickness across different age groups using histopathologic techniques and investigate the factors that may influence the thickness changes. This study aims to provide clinicians with objective evidence of variations in vaginal mucosal thickness, facilitating personalized medical decisions for patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 348 patients who underwent local vaginal wall resection at the West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, from January 2021 and May 2022. The thickness of vaginal mucosa, epithelium and lamina propria was measured precisely under the microscope. And the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile values of vaginal mucosa thickness across different age groups were counted and charted a dot-line plot. The percentile values for vaginal mucosa thickness exhibited a decreasing trend with increasing age; vaginal mucosa thickness showed significant correlations with times of delivery (P = 0.031) and age (P < 0.001), both of which were negatively associated. And vaginal mucosa thickness demonstrated no significant correlation with body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.325), times of abortions (P = 0.511), times of gestation (P = 0.101), menstrual cycle (P = 0.533), or types of delivery (P = 0.056); epithelial thickness showed significant associations with age (P < 0.001) and types of delivery (P = 0.017), both of which were negative correlations. Moreover, BMI (P = 0.429), times of abortions (P = 0.764), delivery (P = 0.079), gestation (P = 0.475), and menstrual cycle (P = 0.950) were nonassociated with epithelial thickness; lamina propria thickness displayed a significant correlation only with age (P = 0.002), and there were no obvious correlations observed between lamina propria thickness and BMI (P = 0.374), times of abortion (P = 0.417), delivery (P = 0.053), gestation (P = 0.101), types of delivery (P = 0.132) and menstrual cycle (P = 0.495). Moreover, when the age segmentation was thresholded at 35 and 50 years, both epithelial thickness and vaginal mucosa thickness were significantly correlated with age (P < 0.05). Lamina propria thickness was associated with age when the age threshold was set at 35 years (P = 0.007), whereas it showed no strong link with age when the age threshold was 50 years (P = 0.072). This study has innovatively established percentile reference values for vaginal mucosa thickness based on histopathology, furnishing clinicians with objective evidence of variations in vaginal mucosal thickness to facilitate personalized medical decisions for patients. The findings demonstrated a strong link between vaginal mucosa thickness and age, with epithelium likely playing a predominant role, while the association with lamina propria appeared to be less significant. Further research involving a larger sample size is warranted to elucidate the potential relationship with the lamina propria.

Indexed as

Mucous MembraneVaginaAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsBody Mass IndexChinaEpitheliumFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAgeEpithelial thicknessHistological measurementsLamina propria thicknessVaginal mucosa thickness

Identifiers

PMID39128895
PMCPMC11317504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.