ArticleWater research2024
Sorption-based atmospheric water harvesting for continuous water production in the built environment: Assessment of water yield and quality.
Article in Water research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermodynamic Stability Boundary of Hygroscopic Salt-Embedded Composite Materials for Atmospheric Water Harvesting.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Trade-Off between Adsorption and Regeneration in Functional Metal-Organic Frameworks for Atmospheric Water Harvesting: A Multiscale Modeling Approach.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Computational Prediction of the Complete Adsorption-Regeneration Cycle of Functionalized Metal-Organic Frameworks for Atmospheric Water Harvesting.ACS applied nano materials · 2026Article
- Revealing water-biopolymer interactions: Toward advanced water collection from air.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sorption-based atmospheric water harvesting (SAWH) is a promising solution for localized high-quality water production. Application of SAWH indoors offers dual benefits of on-site water generation and humidity control. This study evaluated the use of SAWH for water production in residential or office buildings, employing a portable zeolite-based SAWH device. Over the twelve-month testing period in the arid southwestern USA, the device achieved a median water yield of 3.6 L/day at a cost 30 % less than bottled water sold in the U.S. A mathematical model was developed for predicting water yield under different temperature and relative humidity (RH) conditions. Daily water yields were well fitted with the modified Langmuir model, with absolute humidity serving as the only prediction variable. Water extracted from a well-ventilated office building generally met the drinking water standards set by USEPA. However, elevated levels of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were detected in the samples collected from the residential house (median = 32.6 mg/L), emphasizing the influence of human activities (e.g., cooking) on the emission of volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in the air, which consequently reside in harvested water. Aldehydes and volatile fatty acids (formate, acetate) comprised roughly 50 % of the DOC found in the AWE water. A carbon fiber filter was not effective at removing these substances, highlighting the need for further research into effective treatment methods for DOC management before the safe use of AWE water. Overall, this study provides critical insights for the practical application of indoor SAWH as a decentralized source of high-quality water and emphasizes the need to identify and manage DOC for its safe use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.