ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2024
Serial gait speed measurements over time and dynamic survival prediction in older adults.
Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between upper limb flexibility and all-cause mortality in the oldest-old.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Pacing longevity: Serial gait speed measurements and survival in older adults.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA one-time gait speed measurement predicts mortality risk. A framework for updating a clinician's mortality risk perception with new information from each clinic visit is needed. We used joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data for dynamic prediction of mortality risk.
methodsWe fit sex-stratified joint models to 20-meter (bi)annual longitudinal gait speed measured every 6 months and 14-year survival data from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study allowing for non-linear fluctuations of gait speed and controlling for important covariates such as age, recent hospitalization, blood pressure, obesity, and comorbidities.
resultsParticipants (N = 3048) were 74 years old with gait speed 1.18 m/s. They were 42% Black, and 52% died over 14 years. Higher gait speed of 0.1 m/s was associated with 23% (95% confidence interval or CI = 20-25%) and 25% (CI = 21-28%) reductions in mortality risk in men and women; and a 0.05 m/s annualized slowing (slope) with 31% (CI = 13-51%) increase in men (all p < 0.05), with findings persisting after covariate adjustment. Distant gait speed history over a year prior contributed little for mortality risk prediction with mean change of only 1-2% in 5-year risk.
conclusionThe two most recent gait speeds appear sufficient to consider for mortality risk in the present initial analysis. More frequent gait speeds need to be considered in mortality risk prediction before definitive conclusions supporting real-world application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.