ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
A giant pelvic infiltrating schwannoma misdiagnosed as an ovarian neoplasm that was resected using a laparoscopic approach: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Large retroperitoneal schwannomas are rare and present significant challenges in surgical management, particularly when located in the pelvic region. Gynecologists can encounter rare problems when a pelvic schwannoma is mistaken for an adnexal pathology. Case Presentation: A 62-year-old woman presented with a giant retroperitoneal mass suspected of a potentially malignant ovarian tumor preoperatively. Computed tomography revealed a large mixed solid-cystic mass near the right adnexa measuring 118 × 100 × 80 mm. The cancer antigen 125 level was 196 U/mL. We performed a diagnostic-operative laparoscopy, which showed a retroperitoneal neoformation below the cava and aortic bifurcation adherent to the sacrum, right pelvic vessels, and hypogastric nerve up to the vagina. We carefully detached the mass from the nearby tissues using the most appropriate laparoscopic devices. The entire neoplasm was removed through the vagina into a surgical bag. The surgery lasted 180 min without complications. Histology revealed a grade I benign schwannoma. At the 12-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic without signs of recurrence. Clinical Discussion: Pelvic retroperitoneal schwannomas can mimic ovarian carcinomas; misdiagnosis may occur due to their rarity and the difficulty of interpreting preoperative imaging. In case of unexpected giant presacral schwannomas surgical management is challenging due to their peculiar location. Conclusion: This case underscores the need for a skilled, experienced team of gynecological oncologists to achieve favorable outcomes when performing laparoscopic surgery of giant pelvic retroperitoneal schwannoma. Adequate knowledge of the complex pelvic anatomy, careful surgical planning, and familiarity with the most appropriate surgical tools are critical points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.