Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39128213›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024

Esophageal laceration after failed endoscopic intragastric ballon retrieval and open approach treatment case report.

Jesús Eduardo Prior-Rosas, Jaime Roberto Magaña-Salcedo, Omar Marino Gutiérrez-Olivares, Alejandro Jiménez Canet Atilano, David Lomeli Reyes

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesús Eduardo Prior-RosasDepartment of Surgery, General Hospital, Dr. Darío Fernández Fierro ISSSTE, Mexico. Electronic address: jeprior93@gmail.com.
Jaime Roberto Magaña-SalcedoNational Medical Center "20 de Noviembre", ISSSTE, Mexico.
Omar Marino Gutiérrez-OlivaresDepartment of Surgery, General Hospital, Dr. Darío Fernández Fierro ISSSTE, Mexico.
Alejandro Jiménez Canet AtilanoDepartment of Surgery, General Hospital, Dr. Darío Fernández Fierro ISSSTE, Mexico; Department of Endoscopy, General Hospital, Dr. Darío Fernández Fierro ISSSTE, Mexico.
David Lomeli ReyesNational Medical Center "20 de Noviembre", ISSSTE, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and importanceThe intragastric ballon (IGB) is an minimal invasive alternative treatment of weight loss, it has a rate of complications of 2.8-5.5 %. This case highlights the importance of surveillance of the patients to prevent further complications. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a 43 years old women with IMC of 31.25 kg/m DISCUSSION: Given the high cost, complication risk and invasiveness of bariatric surgery, intragastric ballon treatment may present a safer and lower cost option for weight reduction. Most of the available IGB are recommended time for gastric ballon removal is 6-12 months, with the appropriate surveillance. In our case it was not possible to endoscopic retrieval due malfunction of the Spatz-3's valve, thickening wall and its partial migration towards the fundus and cardia which causes an esophageal laceration and gastric bleeding.

conclusionMandatory education and accreditation of physicians dealing with bariatric endoscopy and strict supervision of obese individuals throughout the time they have the balloon in their stomachs will eliminate most complications.

Indexed as

Case reportEsophageal lacerationIntragastric ballonLaparotomy

Identifiers

PMID39128213
PMCPMC11359964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.