Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39128063›Full record

SynthesisThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2024

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Guoying Feng, Yi Feng, Shu Yao, Xun Huang, Zuxiang Peng, Yongliang Tang, Wen Tang, Zhengyan Li, Hanchen Wang, Hongming Liu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guoying FengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yi FengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shu YaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xun HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zuxiang PengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yongliang TangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wen TangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhengyan LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hanchen WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hongming LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsIn this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared to TACE monotherapy for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND

methodsRelevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until September 1, 2023. Our analysis included 7 cohort studies encompassing a total of 630 patients.

resultsThe results demonstrated that the TACE plus HAIC group exhibited significantly improved prognosis compared to the TACE alone group, as evidenced by superior rates of complete response, partial response, progressive disease, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Moreover, the TACE group displayed a lower risk of platelet reduction and vomiting when compared to the TACE plus HAIC group. None of the 7 studies reported any intervention-related mortality.

conclusionIn conclusion, the combination of TACE and HAIC may be recommended as a viable option for patients with unresectable HCC, given its evident enhancements in survival and tumor response rates without significant differences in adverse events when compared to TACE monotherapy. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials and studies involving Western cohorts are warranted to further validate these findings.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticHepatic ArteryInfusions, Intra-ArterialLiver NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39128063
PMCPMC11114167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.