ArticleThoracic research and practice2024
Evaluation of Long-Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases Readmitted to Intensive Care Units Due to Acute Respiratory Failure: Point Prevalence Study.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Response to: Evaluation of Long-Coronavirus Disease-2019 Cases Readmitted to Intensive Care Units due to Acute Respiratory Failure: Point Prevalence StudyThoracic research and practice · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Cases of Long-Coronavirus Disease-2019 Reported as being Readmitted to Intensive Care Units Due to Acute Respiratory Failure: CorrespondenceThoracic research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused morbidity and mortality worldwide. Besides the acute effects, subacute and long-term effects are defined as long-COVID causing morbidity. The intensive care unit (ICU) data of long-COVID-19 cases were evaluated with the participation of 11 centers. MATERIAL AND
methodsStudy was designed by Turkish Thoracic Society Respiratory Failure and Intensive Care Working Group to evaluate long COVID-19 patients. All patients followed up in the ICU with long-COVID diagnosis were included in point prevelance study.
resultsA total of 41 long COVID-19 patients from 11 centers were included in the study. Half of the patients were male, mean age was 66 ± 14, body mass index was 27 ± 5. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, lung cancer, malignancy, and heart failure rates were 27%, 51%, 34%, 34%, and 27%, respectively. Eighty percent had received COVID vaccine. Patients had moderate hypoxemic respiratory failure. APACHE II, SOFA score was 18 (14-26), 6 (3-8), respectively. Forty-six percent received invasive mechanical ventilator support, 42% were sepsis, 17% were septic shock. Bilateral (67%), interstitial involvement (37%) were most common in chest x-ray. Fibrosis (27%) was detected in thorax tomography. Seventy-one percent of patients received antibiotherapy (42% carbapenem, 22% linezolid). Sixty-one percent of the patients received corticosteroid treatment.
conclusionMore than half of the patients had pneumonia and the majority of them used broad-spectrum antibiotics. Presence of comorbidities and malignancies, intensive care severity scores, intubation, and sepsis rates were high. Receiving corticosteroid treatment and extensive bilateral radiologic involvement due to COVID-19 might be the reasons for the high re-admission rate for the ICUs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.