Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39127984›Full record

Observational studyClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Real-world dosing patterns of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: the RE-SEARCH study.

Ana María López Muñoz, Encarnación González Flores, Alberto Carral Maseda, Paola Pimentel Cáceres, Ruth Afonso Gómez, Carlos López López, Raquel Jimeno Maté, Juan José Reina Zoilo, Carmen Castañón López, Mercedes Salgado Fernández and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SEOM 2023 clinical guidelines.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ana María López MuñozMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Avenida Islas Baleares S/N, 09006, Burgos, Spain. alopezmu@saludcastillayleon.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5476-3957
Encarnación González FloresMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Alberto Carral MasedaMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
Paola Pimentel CáceresMedical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia, Cartagena, Spain.
Ruth Afonso GómezMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Carlos López LópezMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla IDIVAL, UNICAN, Santander, Spain.
Raquel Jimeno MatéMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Juan José Reina ZoiloMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Carmen Castañón LópezMedical Oncology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain.
Mercedes Salgado FernándezMedical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Ourense, Ourense, Spain.
Jorge Aparicio UrtasunMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Elena Asensio MartínezMedical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain.
Teresa Martín GómezMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the dosing patterns of regorafenib in a real-world population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a routine clinical practice setting in Spain, focusing on the starting dose of regorafenib.

methodsAn observational, retrospective, multicenter study that included patients ≥ 18 years old who had histologically documented mCRC and who had initiated treatment with regorafenib since January 2017. Post hoc categorization of dosing patterns revealed the following: initial dose < 160 mg and dose escalation, initial dose < 160 mg and maintenance, initial dose equal to 160 mg and maintenance, and initial dose equal to 160 mg and dose reduction.

resultsMost patients (152/241, 63.8%) initiated treatment with regorafenib at doses < 160 mg. There was large variation in the starting dose of regorafenib over time: in 2017, most patients (59%) initiated regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg, this proportion decreased to 6% in 2021. There were no significant differences in the median progression-free survival according to the regorafenib dose patterns during the first two cycles. The proportion of patients who reported at least one adverse event (AE), had a grade 3-4 AE or had an AE leading to dose reduction was greater in the group of patients who received an initial dose equal to 160 and reduction.

conclusionsOur results indicate that physicians in Spain have gradually adopted a dose-escalation approach during cycle 1, which is a common practice for starting treatment with a reduced dose (< 160 mg/day), a strategy that seems to improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesSpainAntineoplastic AgentsPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesregorafenibDosing patternsMetastatic colorectal cancerRegorafenib

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.